I am not happy to just take the piss but I understand why I give this impression. I genuinely admire what you do and I am genuinely a big fan of yours, and I genuinely mean this.
The problem is this is a very big topic, it seems to be accompanied by an ideology that has a lot to unpack - your posts can be quite long, but every point seems debatable. Yet it is an interesting enough topic that I feel compelled to comment in some way even in passing. I am not being dismissive, I am just pressed for time mostly.
We can take a couple of brief examples: In your history of mankind, to paraphrase, it seems the stone age was followed by the industrial revolution was followed by high tech. And the answer is to go back to the stone age. You also seem to think, to paraphrase, that infectious disease is a product of urban living and the rise of cities. How do you think influenza spreads around the world in one season, and did so in 1918 before there was air travel and when the population of the planet was probably the max it can now support (around 1.6 billion)? Killing maybe 5% of the world's population? These would be the subjet of a lot of debate to get to the bottom of how each other are thinking. Is witchcraft really just a branch of herbalism?
I want to repeat that I have huge respect for what you do, and I am with you in a love of nature - for its own sake. Or rather, because I understand that it is us, and we are it. But not because I see science and techology and inherently destructive of the above. Only their excesses and their use by more people than the planet can support, and in combination with the worst aspects of human nature. Science is just wondrous knowledge beyond the 5 senses and technology is just tools. I don't see them as the enemy.