Or maybe Christine Assange looking at the British press and oddball sites like WSWS - there are no Archived Message
Posted by CJ on June 24, 2019, 4:34 am, in reply to "Re: WSWS using JA to attack JC and Labour yet again - some balance here:"
end of people who want to damage JC for reasons that have nothing to do with JA and Christine A may not be aware of that. I addressed your quote with the link to Diane Abbot's tweet and the extract including this:" or any rape charge that may be brought by Swedish authorities shouldn’t be ignored. " - There is no statement by DA here that "Assange should face Swedish extradition—even before an extradition request had been received!" this was issued in April this year. By saying "any rape charge should not be ignored" this could include taking action to agree to face those charges provided there are sound security guarantees for JA's safety and ensuring he would not be released legally or illegally to the USA. Oh and just to emphasise, JC is not in power yet to do anything apart from occasionally commenting - which he has done - and once again few UK politicians have come out in support unlike JC and DA. Do I wish all MPs would come out daily and support the release and non-extradition of JA - of course I do - but I'm not going to be overly critical of JC and DA after they have actually been more supportive than most. Any Australian political leaders come out in support of JA their citizen? If the WSWS thought they could get away with it I bet they would join the anti-A-S brigade just to bring down Corbyn. I don't trust their motives one iota.
|
|