See prior TLN discussion: Archived Message
Posted by sashimi on October 20, 2019, 11:00 pm, in reply to "Could someone please c-&-p the faecesbrook conversation with ML. I don't do fb or any of them, and"
Message Thread:
- My article for Global Research - Alison Banville October 20, 2019, 11:30 am
- Ta for both links, A. NOM - Rhisiart Gwilym October 20, 2019, 12:02 pm
- Re: Ta for both links, A. NOM - Alison Banville October 20, 2019, 12:04 pm
- thanks for the article - I was surprised by the comments on Media Lens - I saw 2 supportive comments - CJ October 20, 2019, 2:29 pm
- Well done CJ. Mirrors my search on the subject. 2 hits etc nm - Tomski October 20, 2019, 3:07 pm
- Re: Well done CJ. Mirrors my search on the subject. 2 hits etc nm - Alison Banville October 20, 2019, 6:18 pm
- Re: Well done CJ. Mirrors my search on the subject. 2 hits etc nm - Tomski October 20, 2019, 8:20 pm
- Could someone please c-&-p the faecesbrook conversation with ML. I don't do fb or any of them, and - Rhisiart Gwilym October 20, 2019, 9:46 pm
- See prior TLN discussion: - sashimi October 20, 2019, 11:00 pm
- I asked a perfectly civil question - which you managed to answer in a rather uncivil way - I don't - CJ October 21, 2019, 4:36 am
- It's worth noting that Vanessa's twitter site is also heavily suppressed... - Ken Waldron October 21, 2019, 3:44 pm
- I'm fine thanks, A. I too would like to see where ML fails to support Vanessa B. That would be quite - Rhisiart Gwilym October 20, 2019, 5:57 pm
|
|