Re: Another nail in the coffin of the official narrative Archived Message
Posted by Tomski on November 5, 2019, 11:23 pm, in reply to "Re: Another nail in the coffin of the official narrative"
When NIST were confronted by Chandler re WTC7 free fall, eventually they admitted the fact and thereafter fudged it and no-one was any the wiser. It was the sleight of hand that everybody in the know knew was the corruption of science. Secondly, standard structural software was used. Many practices use these on a day-to-day basis. Nothing exotic. They chose not to release the model on the grounds of national security. It stank. In addition, the model didn't replicate the observations. Importantly, no Building Codes were changed as a result anywhere around the world, that I am aware of. Quite telling, I'd say. Leroy Hulsey's team took them to cleaners with their WTC7 collapse analysis. We hope to see the results of the peer-reviews 15th Nov odd. I don't have any doubt it will come out smelling of roses. Quite an incongruous situation, that the experts in the field now 'know' it is wrong and if it ever comes to a proper inquiry, which is the job of legal eagles, the 'official' case will be blown apart. Chandler's findings were obviously not enough, so now we wait and hope. The twin tower case has now moved into new phase, but unfortunately the evidence is not as 'slam dunk' as in the WTC7 case. Nevertheless Asgard's analysis now really helps on this journey.
|
|