- I wouldn't go that far without seeing it Tomski Archived Message
Posted by walter
on April 6, 2020, 10:26 am, in reply to "Nice one Walter. The vid was cr*p. Not worth analysing ... : ( nm"
|
Hi again Dan's unique position and circumstances give justification for his action here - outwith that, I think no material should be insultingly dismissed. If it's rubbish then it will quickly be shown, won't it? What would we say if the BBC said it was not giving space to 'antisemitism' meaning evidence of Israeli atrocities in the occupied territories? It would be called insulting and we'd be up in arms. As it happens I think the 5G weapons theorists are barking up the wrong tree - or missing out a lot of solid trees to bark up on the way, as there is plenty to be concerned about regarding 5G, 4G, 3G and 2G - and the evidence is, well, mountainous. See my BBC post down below for a summary. A priori, it's unlikely that 5G caused the coronavirus in China (though it was rolled out heavily in Wuhan) but I haven't seen the specific case so I wouldn't insult another poster by saying it's rubbish if no-one has considered the case. Similarly, there's a glimmer of support from the fact(?) that 5G frequencies were developed as bioweapons (weren't they used in crowd control to give skin pain?), but presumably at higher levels of strength. Clearly a line has been crossed and I think these questions and evidence are better aired when they can be rebutted or take their rightful place in the debate and our consciousness, based on the evidence. Cheers |