Re: Why did Labour lose? Charlie Kimber 1 Archived Message
Posted by Keith-264 on April 20, 2020, 7:41 pm, in reply to "Re: Why did Labour lose? Charlie Kimber 1"
Eythenkew! He's still sulking because I want the New York kamikaze discussions barred. Disagreeing with him is bad enough but mockery is beyond the pale. I thought that the article was a detailed version of what I've been saying all along; for Corbyn to have been different would have been for Corbyn to not be a reformist toady, same as Bliar. As far as Corbyn or any Liarbour supporter is worth the bother I despise them but this means that I can just about bother to raise a yawn. All the dossier demonstrates is that there are some people who only want a plausible excuse to keep expecting the same behaviour to get different results despite 100 years of betrayal.
|
|