"...before putting ONS figures about as gospel ..." Archived Message Posted by Ken Waldron on May 5, 2020, 10:06 pm, in reply to "Take note of this dissection from an Off-G contributor before putting ONS figures about as gospel -" Most people here have been gauging whats happening by using ONS total death figures: the latest kindly updated by Flash above because, well, they actually are gospel: All these people are quite definitely dead. "About the only thing one can say with confidence is that something bad happened in London, what exactly still not clear." No. Its happening all over the country: that's very clear. London's expected cumulative mortality was about five to six weeks ahead of where it normally would be: the rest about two to three. See here: https://members5.boardhost.com/xxxxx/msg/1588362243.html Message Thread: Latest ONS weekly death totals to 24th April - flash May 5, 2020, 10:21 am Re: Latest ONS weekly death totals to 24th April - Mary May 5, 2020, 11:20 am Thx - all deaths trend is most helpful stat (for me anyway) nm - MikeD May 5, 2020, 3:49 pm Take note of this dissection from an Off-G contributor before putting ONS figures about as gospel - - Rhisiart Gwilym May 5, 2020, 6:52 pm Re: Take note of this dissection from an Off-G contributor before putting ONS figures about as gospel - - dan May 5, 2020, 7:31 pm Not convinced by OffG argument ... - Tomski May 5, 2020, 7:45 pm "...before putting ONS figures about as gospel ..." - Ken Waldron May 5, 2020, 10:06 pm It walks like a duck, it squawks like a duck.. - Shyaku May 6, 2020, 5:08 pm   Searching