- But Ken, dan's obvious suffering notwithstanding, WTF are 'the facts'? If you can disentangle them, Archived Message
Posted by Rhisiart Gwilym
on May 7, 2020, 10:39 pm, in reply to "No shame?"
|
you know more than me. And yes, it is entirely appropriate to post such material on a site dedicated to teasing out the truth from the 'news'. All theses need to be examined. I don't know for sure whether Wolfgang is right, but if we can't listen to a man with his provenance, we're kidding ourselves. I was very struck with the obvious fact that dan was having a really bad time, and that he was terrified that something dreadful was going to happen to his loved-ones; if it was just a flu, it was a real bugger. And I've been arguing for his front-line testimony on London hospitals for some time on other sites, including Off-G, as seriously-reliable eye-witness reportage, because - once again - I consider such personal testimony from a qualified professional on the frontline to be a crucial part of the process. I've copped flak already for re-reporting dan's accounts of his own illness, and the situation for him and colleagues in their work. Now flak here for pointing up the Wodarg assessment.  But - like everyone else, I believe - I still don't know what the real story about all this is; nor do I know which are the real facts and which are something else. Wait-and-see is the only meticulously objective stance to take just now; and - examine all theses! BTW, I follow possible conspiracies because I'm fascinated by the way they can be pulled in broad daylight, with obvious anomalies shouting in our faces, and yet so many of us still insist on denying them, or in some cases blanking them with the pose of terminal boredom. The excellent Craig Murray, for example, asserts definitively that the beeb's 'Saving Syria's Children' Panorama episode was definitely a fake, yet he bans any discussion of the obvious false-flag nature of 11/9. Irrational or what? It's simply astonishing, and quite out of keeping with an allegedly argumentative and maverick reality-seeking website such as his, or this one. I've no idea what kind of conspiracy, if any, is operating with covid. Wouldn't surprise me if there were one - or several - but I'll reserve judgement until I see some clear evidence that they really happened. At the moment, I've no bleedin' idea what's really going on; nor, I think, has anyone else, not for the entire picture. Lots of firm - not to say rabid - opinions; no clear proofs. This could just as easily turn out in the end to have been an extraordinary fit of collective madness roaring round the world like a sudden panic stampede of herd animals, with no clear cause at all; or it could turn out to have been a bad pandemic that killed quite a lot more people than a 'normal' year; or a conspiracy - or several. I've just no idea! Show me your trove of sure-fire, tried and tested facts, Ken. I'd be really grateful. And perhaps you can explain how, sitting at home like me, you come to be reliably assured of which facts are in fact factual. Who do you trust to know the whole picture, and why? All the above considered - no, no shame. A certain embarrassment at my congenital aspi-style lack of social subtlety, certainly, but not shame. This stuff needs to be discussed - right across the board. Cheers bro! 
|