- Re: But Ken, dan's obvious suffering notwithstanding, WTF are 'the facts'? If you can disentangle them, Archived Message
Posted by AlanG
on May 8, 2020, 11:54 am, in reply to "But Ken, dan's obvious suffering notwithstanding, WTF are 'the facts'? If you can disentangle them, "
|
Thanks for your sane response Rhis. 'aspi-style'? We thought it was Welsh windbaggery  . We've read and seen nothing to tell us we should not be considering and debating every thesis, every possiblity. Not seeking to discredit messengers, the most dishonest response of all. As we've observed before, this message board is 'a forum providing up-to-date information and resources in support of media criticism and other activism.' [the gospel according to Dan!] In the tradition of the Davids it seems obvious to us that the appropriate targets of such criticism should be the sewage outlets of the mainstream whose current preoccupation is bigging up the fear, obscuring, obfuscating, distracting and blindsiding contrary opinion. The removal of oppositional statements from public view is an outrage. Why anyone posting here should want to endorse this shitfukkery is beyond us. (Its enough to turn us into conspiracy theorists. Oh I forgot. We already are.) The removal of oppositional statements from public view is an outrage. Every next step in the controlling of the narrative alarms us more. (Yes, there is something to be afraid of and its not the bloody virus!) Are you going to post the Michael Lesher article here or shall we? |