Your calling professor dave an imposter was what i called dramatic - everyone on youtube is after donations/ad money (including the vids you transcribed, until they were stopped) - he never claimed not to be. You disagree with his views, but they're really what i'd expect from someone who works as a chemistry lecturer: hoving to the science - you might argue about 'the science' being bad on 5G due to influence of non-science forces, but that doesn't make prof dave an imposter, just maybe naive/ignorant in your formulation.
He makes loads of useful-looking video lectures on physics and chemistry i've now found, which i'll probably be watching (i'll let you know if i end up thinking they have no value and are just shilling for big corporate science). I ignored your comments about adamski calling people idiots - i took him to mean eg the people who thought viruses don't exist rather than anyone here, but even if he did, no biggie - different posting styles - it's not my approach, but he's not the only one in this ecosystem with such a style and i wouldn't be without any of them - anyway i'm not sure it's really different to my over-polite passive aggressive version of criticism.