Re: University of Sussex's vice chancellor defends professor after protesters tried to have her sacked Archived Message
Posted by Sinister Burt on October 10, 2021, 1:36 pm, in reply to "Re: University of Sussex's vice chancellor defends professor after protesters tried to have her sacked"
I'm just considering the parts of male/female-ness that aren't directly related to reproduction but are still 'biological'/genetic, and still would be taken by people in the real world as indications of someone's sex unthinkingly (whatever the semantics of sex/gender may be) - rather than saying anything that isn't gonads is social, as I don't think that's correct. For the the fuzziness of sex itself as a category I'm just badly repeating what I've (mis)read in multiple sciencey places as being what the 'current thinking' is (whoever gets to judge that) - take it up with those sources (eg end of the valkai vid). But this is semantics - I accept your gonads based sex definition in the context that's useful (reproduction/gcse biology)
|
|