Re: When smug "journalists" get it back in the face and then some Archived Message
Posted by scrabb on March 2, 2023, 5:43 pm, in reply to "Re: When smug "journalists" get it back in the face and then some"
I find it illuminating that the presenter engages in the very same ploy of not presenting all the facts so as to give context that his hero Doug complains of and is so exercised about. There must be a name for that, though can't think what it might be. The opposite of "Having your cake and eating it" perhaps.
|
Message Thread:
- When smug "journalists" get it back in the face and then some - Adamki March 1, 2023, 9:22 pm
- Re: When smug "journalists" get it back in the face and then some - Ken Waldron March 1, 2023, 10:17 pm
- Re: I don't see this as a valuable debate, got shrill and personal and left rational debate behind, - John Monro March 2, 2023, 3:41 am
- Re: When smug "journalists" get it back in the face and then some - Sinister Burt March 2, 2023, 8:43 am
- Re: When smug "journalists" get it back in the face and then some - Sinister Burt March 2, 2023, 1:10 pm
- Que? - Tomski March 2, 2023, 5:19 pm
- Re: Que? - sinister burt March 2, 2023, 8:10 pm
- Re: Que? - Tomski March 2, 2023, 8:57 pm
- Re: Que? - sinister burt March 2, 2023, 9:54 pm
- Re: Que? - sinister burt March 2, 2023, 10:06 pm
- Re: Que? - Tomski March 3, 2023, 2:19 pm
- Re: Que? - sinister burt March 3, 2023, 11:07 pm
- Re: When smug "journalists" get it back in the face and then some - scrabb March 2, 2023, 5:43 pm
- Re: When smug "journalists" get it back in the face and then some - Shyaku March 2, 2023, 10:37 am
- Taibbi seemed honest - Keith-264 March 2, 2023, 6:39 pm
|
|