Was using the same logic as everyother weekend.
It was obvious that the then, every weekend approach, was less profitable than the every other.
Remember, NAPA first had a 20+ race schedule.
That was not profitable. And so, as I pointed out, the every other weekend approach afforded those that were not racing to attend the races(PITS) "more often' rather than just when their class was running.
Thus, more frequent attendance by more people more often, equals more money(PITS).
Fegan, figured that one out.
NOW, that the "overall" attendance is less than profitable...
Less races, with mORE participants in attendance is the logic. Isn't it?
Racelogic dictates back gate hauls the freight.