The article was written, at a guess, about ten maybe twelve years ago, it was aimed at beach access generally around the Matata area, in the Bay of Plenty.

At that time there was good communication between those trying to protect the beaches and the Whakatane Angling Club. They worked together, along with schools to get new grasses to take hold to help prevent erosion from the sea.

It must be recognised that councils have a budget to work to, they cannot be seen raising rates to keep anglers happy, I fear that would not go down well with rate payers. However, if anglers got together and offered their services to do the necessary work, plus police the beach through appointed beach wardens, this may be acceptable. All it takes is a few number plates recorded photos, easy with cell phones, then prosecutions can take place.

However, again a criticism, for anglers to sit back and criticise councils without any positive input will only alienate locals and councillors who are doing their best with very limited funds.

Has anybody discovered the cost of keeping that area open to the public, or if it saves the council money by closing it off. No matter how unpopular this move may be, you can only combat the problem with facts, not insulting the people of Wairoa.

Anglers need to start thinking outside the square. There are several other groups of people who use the foreshore for recreation, anglers do not have first claim, although sometimes one would be forgiven for thinking so.

Use a few dollars of club funds and put a notice in the Wairoa newspaper calling for public submissions regarding access. This is a useful first move and if the response is positive, it gives an excellent approach for a proper request for the council to set up a consultation process. Approach other clubs and get their input also, unity is strength and this should never be forgotten.