The Lifeboat News
[
Message Archive
|
The Lifeboat News
]
Why is there no reaction to Dan finally admitting the ban on West virginia is permanent?
Archived Message
Posted by walter
on April 25, 2019, 4:54 pm
Why is there no reaction to Dan finally admitting the ban on west virginia is permanent?
Some people here have hurled dozens of insults for every time that wv has snapped back at someone insulting him!
And Dan's reasons have varied with the wind. Why are they never questioned?
Message Thread:
Why is there no reaction to Dan finally admitting the ban on West virginia is permanent?
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 4:54 pm
Excuse my silence on the subject, but no forum exists in which I could discuss such tricky matters!
-
Twirlip
April 25, 2019, 5:28 pm
Eh ... perhaps because people on the whole agree with it? nm
-
Willem
April 25, 2019, 5:58 pm
Er - no. *Always* opposed to arbitrary and unaccountable power in the hands of a minority. That
-
Rhisiart Gwilym
April 25, 2019, 6:14 pm
It's Dan's board -- not a country with citizens!
-
Willem
April 25, 2019, 7:06 pm
When kids play football and one says "It's MY ball, YOU'RE not playing", do the others carry on? nm
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 7:25 pm
Walter please. Your playground analogy is well below par and not worthy of consideration nm
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 8:04 pm
Assertions and evasions...Is "It's Dan's board" worthy of consideration then?
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 8:33 pm
"he could have joined the next day under a different name". He didn't-shows good faith, No?
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 11:05 am
Which of Dan's changing reasons do you agree with then, WIllem? nm
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 7:31 pm
Re: Which of Dan's changing reasons do you agree with then, WIllem? nm
-
Willem
April 25, 2019, 10:53 pm
Re: Which of Dan's changing reasons do you agree with then, WIllem? nm
-
Shyaku
April 26, 2019, 9:58 am
I've listed them in the post further up beneath Dan's post. Which ones make perfect sense? NM
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 12:17 pm
Er ... because we respect Dan's decision and his request not to discuss the matter any further? nm
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 6:26 pm
Respect Dan, fine. But why do you respect the decision, don't the reasons matter at all? NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 8:41 pm
Do you remember saying this, Tomski: "Can we make it a month ... like Tman?"
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 11:24 pm
Or "WV has been hounded by Tman from the start..."
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 11:26 pm
Or "The poor sod is going to pieces in front of our eyes because he is being hounded."?
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 11:28 pm
Because we knew in January?
-
Ken Waldron
April 25, 2019, 6:41 pm
Many people expressed the hope it wasn't permanent
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 6:55 pm
Re: Many people expressed the hope it wasn't permanent
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 7:20 pm
Re: Many people expressed the hope it wasn't permanent
-
Ken Waldron
April 25, 2019, 7:21 pm
Re: Many people expressed the hope it wasn't permanent
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 7:29 pm
Right with you Ken, especially your concluding sentence nm
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 8:08 pm
My concluding sentence asks a question of Ken's concluding sentence Tomski...
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 8:29 pm
Saves us going around in circles Walter, please read Ken's note again ...
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 8:38 pm
It's not a circle, Tomski
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 8:45 pm
Speculate as you wish Walter. I trust Dan and that is the last word from me. Toodle-pip nm
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 8:58 pm
A direct question isn't speculation. If it's about trust you agree with all of Dan's reasons then?NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 9:03 pm
If you want speculation how about - "Glad to be rid of the dissenting voice-who cares whats fair" NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 9:57 pm
I trust Dan and that is the last word from me. Ditto nm
-
MikeD
April 26, 2019, 9:57 am
When did Dan become the only person in the world whose output is immune from scrutiny? nm
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 10:33 am
"If I didn't trust (Dan) to make that call I wouldn't be here." Spot on. nm
-
MikeD
April 26, 2019, 10:00 am
An amazing fake and fawning dynamic is developing here nm
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 12:30 pm
Re: Because we knew in January?
-
ceemac666
April 25, 2019, 6:55 pm
Six hours, and no-one can cite a reason for the ban they agree with - remarkable? NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 9:59 pm
Re: Six hours, and no-one can cite a reason for the ban they agree with - remarkable? NM
-
ceemac666
April 25, 2019, 10:08 pm
Re: Six hours, and no-one can cite a reason for the ban they agree with - remarkable? NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 10:26 pm
Re: Six hours, and no-one can cite a reason for the ban they agree with - remarkable? NM
-
ceemac666
April 25, 2019, 10:53 pm
(no subject)
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 11:32 pm
Re: (no subject)
-
ceemac666
April 26, 2019, 6:35 am
Re: (no subject)
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 10:47 am
It is indeed a "remarkable spectacle", and I wish I had been able to remain a mere spectator! [nm]
-
Twirlip
April 26, 2019, 6:10 pm
For numerically challenged, it's 5 hours ... 10 - 5 = 5. Just sayin' : ) nm
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 10:19 pm
Ah that's me - thanks! nm
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 10:21 pm
My arithmetic was right though - about the number of reasons agreed with so far NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 11:34 pm
I have no recollection of the WV issue but I am uncomfortable with absolute power even in the hands
-
CJ
April 26, 2019, 4:55 am
Thanks CJ nm
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 12:00 pm
If no-one can support ANY of Dan's reasons, isn't that BETTER than a vote? NM
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 12:22 pm
My brutally honest reaction: I really don't care. I come here for info, not community or democracy
-
Matt
April 26, 2019, 7:51 am
I pretty much agree with this
-
Bluefool
April 26, 2019, 9:30 am
Thanks for honesty - all the feigned fawning was making me faint NM
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 10:34 am
You're free to leave....nm
-
Keith-264
April 26, 2019, 8:33 am
Troll or not ?
-
Poster123
April 26, 2019, 8:37 am
no time now but....
-
dan
April 26, 2019, 9:16 am
Amen...& thank you Dan for keeping this resource alive :) nm
-
MikeD
April 26, 2019, 9:55 am
Crucial first line, dan. Hadn't grasped that. OK, then best to leave things as is. And ditto MikeD N
-
Rhisiart Gwilym
April 26, 2019, 10:06 am
False choice - who asked for a debating society Dan nm
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 12:06 pm
I clearly explained that I thought that would be the result. I nowhere said that anyone
-
dan
April 26, 2019, 12:53 pm
Banned me - would they? I've never had a post deleted in sixteen years Dan
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 1:54 pm
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who keeps being reminded of Everyman's early concerns! [nm]
-
Twirlip
April 26, 2019, 3:59 pm
Searching