The Lifeboat News
[
Message Archive
|
The Lifeboat News
]
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who keeps being reminded of Everyman's early concerns! [nm]
Archived Message
Posted by Twirlip
on April 26, 2019, 3:59 pm, in reply to "
no time now but....
"
nm
Message Thread:
|
This response
↓
Why is there no reaction to Dan finally admitting the ban on West virginia is permanent?
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 4:54 pm
Excuse my silence on the subject, but no forum exists in which I could discuss such tricky matters!
-
Twirlip
April 25, 2019, 5:28 pm
Eh ... perhaps because people on the whole agree with it? nm
-
Willem
April 25, 2019, 5:58 pm
Er - no. *Always* opposed to arbitrary and unaccountable power in the hands of a minority. That
-
Rhisiart Gwilym
April 25, 2019, 6:14 pm
It's Dan's board -- not a country with citizens!
-
Willem
April 25, 2019, 7:06 pm
When kids play football and one says "It's MY ball, YOU'RE not playing", do the others carry on? nm
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 7:25 pm
Walter please. Your playground analogy is well below par and not worthy of consideration nm
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 8:04 pm
Assertions and evasions...Is "It's Dan's board" worthy of consideration then?
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 8:33 pm
"he could have joined the next day under a different name". He didn't-shows good faith, No?
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 11:05 am
Which of Dan's changing reasons do you agree with then, WIllem? nm
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 7:31 pm
Re: Which of Dan's changing reasons do you agree with then, WIllem? nm
-
Willem
April 25, 2019, 10:53 pm
Re: Which of Dan's changing reasons do you agree with then, WIllem? nm
-
Shyaku
April 26, 2019, 9:58 am
I've listed them in the post further up beneath Dan's post. Which ones make perfect sense? NM
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 12:17 pm
Er ... because we respect Dan's decision and his request not to discuss the matter any further? nm
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 6:26 pm
Respect Dan, fine. But why do you respect the decision, don't the reasons matter at all? NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 8:41 pm
Do you remember saying this, Tomski: "Can we make it a month ... like Tman?"
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 11:24 pm
Or "WV has been hounded by Tman from the start..."
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 11:26 pm
Or "The poor sod is going to pieces in front of our eyes because he is being hounded."?
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 11:28 pm
Because we knew in January?
-
Ken Waldron
April 25, 2019, 6:41 pm
Many people expressed the hope it wasn't permanent
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 6:55 pm
Re: Many people expressed the hope it wasn't permanent
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 7:20 pm
Re: Many people expressed the hope it wasn't permanent
-
Ken Waldron
April 25, 2019, 7:21 pm
Re: Many people expressed the hope it wasn't permanent
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 7:29 pm
Right with you Ken, especially your concluding sentence nm
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 8:08 pm
My concluding sentence asks a question of Ken's concluding sentence Tomski...
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 8:29 pm
Saves us going around in circles Walter, please read Ken's note again ...
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 8:38 pm
It's not a circle, Tomski
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 8:45 pm
Speculate as you wish Walter. I trust Dan and that is the last word from me. Toodle-pip nm
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 8:58 pm
A direct question isn't speculation. If it's about trust you agree with all of Dan's reasons then?NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 9:03 pm
If you want speculation how about - "Glad to be rid of the dissenting voice-who cares whats fair" NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 9:57 pm
I trust Dan and that is the last word from me. Ditto nm
-
MikeD
April 26, 2019, 9:57 am
When did Dan become the only person in the world whose output is immune from scrutiny? nm
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 10:33 am
"If I didn't trust (Dan) to make that call I wouldn't be here." Spot on. nm
-
MikeD
April 26, 2019, 10:00 am
An amazing fake and fawning dynamic is developing here nm
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 12:30 pm
Re: Because we knew in January?
-
ceemac666
April 25, 2019, 6:55 pm
Six hours, and no-one can cite a reason for the ban they agree with - remarkable? NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 9:59 pm
Re: Six hours, and no-one can cite a reason for the ban they agree with - remarkable? NM
-
ceemac666
April 25, 2019, 10:08 pm
Re: Six hours, and no-one can cite a reason for the ban they agree with - remarkable? NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 10:26 pm
Re: Six hours, and no-one can cite a reason for the ban they agree with - remarkable? NM
-
ceemac666
April 25, 2019, 10:53 pm
(no subject)
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 11:32 pm
Re: (no subject)
-
ceemac666
April 26, 2019, 6:35 am
Re: (no subject)
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 10:47 am
It is indeed a "remarkable spectacle", and I wish I had been able to remain a mere spectator! [nm]
-
Twirlip
April 26, 2019, 6:10 pm
For numerically challenged, it's 5 hours ... 10 - 5 = 5. Just sayin' : ) nm
-
Tomski
April 25, 2019, 10:19 pm
Ah that's me - thanks! nm
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 10:21 pm
My arithmetic was right though - about the number of reasons agreed with so far NM
-
walter
April 25, 2019, 11:34 pm
I have no recollection of the WV issue but I am uncomfortable with absolute power even in the hands
-
CJ
April 26, 2019, 4:55 am
Thanks CJ nm
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 12:00 pm
If no-one can support ANY of Dan's reasons, isn't that BETTER than a vote? NM
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 12:22 pm
My brutally honest reaction: I really don't care. I come here for info, not community or democracy
-
Matt
April 26, 2019, 7:51 am
I pretty much agree with this
-
Bluefool
April 26, 2019, 9:30 am
Thanks for honesty - all the feigned fawning was making me faint NM
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 10:34 am
You're free to leave....nm
-
Keith-264
April 26, 2019, 8:33 am
Troll or not ?
-
Poster123
April 26, 2019, 8:37 am
no time now but....
-
dan
April 26, 2019, 9:16 am
Amen...& thank you Dan for keeping this resource alive :) nm
-
MikeD
April 26, 2019, 9:55 am
Crucial first line, dan. Hadn't grasped that. OK, then best to leave things as is. And ditto MikeD N
-
Rhisiart Gwilym
April 26, 2019, 10:06 am
False choice - who asked for a debating society Dan nm
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 12:06 pm
I clearly explained that I thought that would be the result. I nowhere said that anyone
-
dan
April 26, 2019, 12:53 pm
Banned me - would they? I've never had a post deleted in sixteen years Dan
-
walter
April 26, 2019, 1:54 pm
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who keeps being reminded of Everyman's early concerns! [nm]
-
Twirlip
April 26, 2019, 3:59 pm
Searching