Re: DOCTOR Andy Wakefield is like REAL-JOURNALIST Julian Assange: crucified for telling the truth. That Archived Message
Posted by mack on September 7, 2019, 12:34 pm, in reply to "Re: DOCTOR Andy Wakefield is like REAL-JOURNALIST Julian Assange: crucified for telling the truth. That "
'Now, anyone can make a mistake, and doctors and scientists do, though this mistake was egregious and difficult to accept as other than fraudulent behaviour. What is wrong and entirely unacceptable is that when this is demonstrable, you don't revisit your findings and accept that you research was inadequate and your findings untrue. Instead, this man ploughs on totally oblivious, and continues to peddle his quack opinions to the severe detriment of communities around the world. That is unforgivable.' Amen to that...er...except Why should I listen to you when this applies to quite a few (probably most) of your comments wrt the events in New York in sept 2001? Shame you can't be consistent in your principles. It's just a tad rich for my taste that you can make these allegations against another while doing precisely the same elsewhere. Here's just a portion of said comments: 'No-one heard or saw any explosions at all.' 'the tallest buildings in the world, using novel construction techniques and saving buckets of money in doing this' 'with the structural design faults and building deficiencies identified by many experts' 'Steel doesn't melt at the temperature of fires in buildings[..], but it looses much of its strength. (50% at 900 deg C)' 'These floors were lightweight trussed structures, bolted to the inner and outer cores. According to some engineers, these were the most vulnerable parts of the building, because when they failed, this meant that the outer structure was no longer tied to the building, and was able to bend outward due to the load above.' Apols to others in thread for changing subject, but it jumped out at me Cheers
|
|