Something not right here, and not convinced on whose missile.. Archived Message
Posted by David Macilwain on January 11, 2020, 10:40 am, in reply to "Re: Terrible news. If the US hadn't assassinated Soleimani none of this would have happened."
Because the story made perfect sense in terms of a second provocation and a planted device, posing as Iran's response to the Soleimani killing. How could it be that anything the Bellingcat-NATO-GICS say turns out to be true? Is it possible the IRGC unit was infiltrated? Or that a SAMS Stinger missile was fired? Bellingcat's story only half fits. TO make it worse, I was just working on a theory that the organises of the downing - MEK or Ukies - didn't expect the Iranian ballistic missile volley to happen just before the plane they targeted was to take off. They planned this strike in advance, because of the Canadian and Ukrainian connection, and the missile launches nearly derailed it... But now that theory doesn't work, they say... THis is also so bad for Iran, already struggling and failing to maintain the high ground, and will give even more impetus to the dickheads in Europe who talk about reviving the nuclear deal while not relenting in their support of sanctions. For any sort of deal to be made with Iran, the first step would be to immediately cancel all sanctions, before talks on removing US troops and bases from Iraq and Iran's borders. Then we might talk about compensation for the hundreds of thousands killed by the West's pillaging and plunder and occupation of the region, and a time line for the removal of all Israeli settlements from the West Bank. I notice the sort of arguments and squawking put up by the BBC guy interviewing Marandi, as he tried to put Iran's case. But you can't argue with barbarians if you have Iranian cultural sensibilities.
|
|