Re: I'll take that as a conditional 'stans-ter-reason-dunnit?' no then. :) NOM Archived Message Posted by brooks on March 2, 2020, 6:59 pm, in reply to "I'll take that as a conditional 'stans-ter-reason-dunnit?' no then. :) NOM" And I'll take that as an admission that you think this whole thing might be a grand global conspiracy involving thousands of scientists and dozens of governments all over the world, many of them hostile to each other. I'm too polite to draw the logical inferences from that. Message Thread: James Corbett on the pandemic (or 'pandemic', if you prefer) - - Rhisiart Gwilym March 2, 2020, 9:27 am Re: James Corbett on the pandemic (or 'pandemic', if you prefer) - - Mary March 2, 2020, 11:08 am Commiserations, M! I'm doing the immune-system support things that I always do - including psychosom - Rhisiart Gwilym March 2, 2020, 12:21 pm Re: James Corbett on the pandemic (or 'pandemic', if you prefer) - - brooks March 2, 2020, 1:02 pm Do you have superior insider info. on the real status of Covid-19, b? Why would Jim's caution about - Rhisiart Gwilym March 2, 2020, 5:23 pm Re: Do you have superior insider info. on the real status of Covid-19, b? Why would Jim's caution about - brooks March 2, 2020, 5:55 pm I'll take that as a conditional 'stans-ter-reason-dunnit?' no then. :) NOM - Rhisiart Gwilym March 2, 2020, 6:06 pm Re: I'll take that as a conditional 'stans-ter-reason-dunnit?' no then. :) NOM - brooks March 2, 2020, 6:59 pm Article makes good sense to me - walter March 2, 2020, 7:00 pm   Searching