Reflections … Archived Message
Posted by Tomski on April 21, 2020, 11:17 pm, in reply to "No need T, it will be closing itself down in a series of chaotic failures over the next few decades,"
… over the next few decades …. Here and Now, boys and girls … as someone said. I’d even agree with your final outcome … it’s shaping up. Unlike you, I wouldn’t like to be pinned down regarding the time-scale. No crystal ball in my case. Depends on the events (climate). Bozo is a lazy, uncaring, dangerous toff. He/they got frightened when confronted with science from Imperial College (Gates funds there somewhere). OK, so there is also the Oxford model to compare with. Different (don’t have the details of the funding but likely to have some links to Big Pharma (they are everywhere : )). We have anecdotal evidence from Dan on the ground (poor sod) dispensing medical guidance here and some (e.g.) interesting factoids about ‘clustering’ cases of c19 connected to mortality spikes (the latter being the graph that focus posted earlier today and others before that, I think). I think that blows out of the water numerous talking points, on its own. Of course, we haven’t got all the data in just yet, but relatively clear signs are here the for discerning observer (who he? … I haven’t got the energy to jump and down and screech … at the mo : ) and develop my own theory about astroturfing on OffG and the likes). Syaku has advised. I think it likely. It is also happening elsewhere on the alt media, not necessarily with evil intent methinks, but stirring the pot nevertheless (e.g. 21st Centurywire) without proper tech advice imo. And yes, the computer models can be scrutinised by the experts. Data in/data out check … and check the difference between the outcomes (against reality at some point). For example WHO said: test, test, test, way back. South Korea did that pronto with plain to see result. Never mind China and the other East Asian lot. Not us. The current situation is there is now 90% air traffic going to Heathrow (for example) and I can bet you my bottom silver coin they are still not testing when people come in (not even for temperature, I bet) … and travelling on the tube, mingling with our essential workforce on the tube etc. Who wins here? … disaster capitalist, Gates Found., Big Pharma, surveillance state. The list is developing as we speak. So yes, now it is let’s wait for the vax time OR test to hell and back, provide PPE and whatever is essential in the hospitals, and in the other essential infrastructure … until you get to a large sample of the general population and start checking out the clusters. Thus, better data. Model it. Rinse and repeat, BUT do it faster than the period of time necessary to develop the vax. Don’t have time for the dodgy stuff : ). Nimble as you trace the clusters without stepping on toes. Without any doubt you are right about caution: on the curfew, C, chloroquine. Sure. Nevertheless, I still think testing is the KEY. If not followed we shall be in the proverbial without the paddle. If they sell us Dystopia land on their own terms, e.g. waiting for the vax (whichever version), it will be our fault for acquiescing. All up for grabs, sure, but let’s focus our mental energy on the relatively clear signposts. Pontificating is hard work but someone’s gotta do it . With best intent Rhis .
|
|