Yes it is. But hardly likely to contain any more outrageous, lying bias than his smearers use. - Archived Message
Posted by Rhisiart Gwilym on May 13, 2020, 5:02 pm, in reply to "Re: Any crew thinking of trusting a Gates-expedited vaccine should see this first -"
Taking all the things I've seen him say on video, and in writing, I'd say that this video was balanced, accurate, and fair. And - as usual with him, it contains more than one assertion by him that he isn't a blanket anti-vaxxer. He takes what seems to me to be the impeccable position, that vaccines can be useful sometimes, in some circumstances, but they must always be scrupulously tested for safety and effectiveness, and be used only where appropriate, not as a great tidal wave of constant life-long - and quite unnecessary - treatment, and never under any circumstances compulsorily, or without proper, fully-informed consent. That's the crooked Gates model. (Note that James Corbett reports that whilst Gates has been promoting his 'charitable' foundation, his personal wealth heap has grown from around fifty billion to over a hundred billion. Some feckin' philanthropist him!) In a nutshell, vaccines must be removed comprehensively from the hands of gangster-capitalists on the make as a license to print money - as they are used currently, and sod the disastrous consequences to the mere-pleb guinea-pigs. That, indeed, goes for all pharmaceuticals, and indeed for the whole concept of a public, non-commercial health service, dedicated to serving all the public even-handedly, and under no circumstances allowed to be commercialised. Whole segments of economic activity in a properly-civilised state need to be formally, permanently out-of-bounds for the money-grubbers. They are sick, sociopathic - and frequently psychopathic - WealthPowerStatus-addicts. What wise community wants such people to be involved in running any necessary public service, even marginally?
|
|