Re: Any crew thinking of trusting a Gates-expedited vaccine should see this first - Archived Message Posted by walter on May 14, 2020, 12:18 pm, in reply to "Re: Any crew thinking of trusting a Gates-expedited vaccine should see this first -" Would be career suicide for a practicing medical professional to produce something like this. They could have got a layman to do it, but that would be less effective. Ironically it was a layman's 'analysis' of the original paper and patient histories that was used when Dr Wakefield was struck off from the BMA. The BMA was seemingly able to distance itself from any genuinely medical substance. As far as I could tell, there was not even a comment from them on the layman's lengthy quasi-medical analysis of the patient histories. The layman (Brian Deer) had pursued Wakefield with a vengeance. His role was extremely odd. From memory the full court details were put behind a paywall of something like £150 to view. Message Thread: Any crew thinking of trusting a Gates-expedited vaccine should see this first - - Rhisiart Gwilym May 12, 2020, 10:17 pm It´s gorne! - Sherwoodian May 13, 2020, 5:33 am Maybe blocked in Deutschland, S. still working for me. NOM - Rhisiart Gwilym May 13, 2020, 7:13 am and me - maybe try a proxy server or VPN? - walter May 13, 2020, 6:16 pm Re: Any crew thinking of trusting a Gates-expedited vaccine should see this first - - pete-g May 13, 2020, 3:11 pm Yes it is. But hardly likely to contain any more outrageous, lying bias than his smearers use. - - Rhisiart Gwilym May 13, 2020, 5:02 pm Re: Yes it is. But hardly likely to contain any more outrageous, lying bias than his smearers use. - - Gerard May 14, 2020, 1:01 pm Re: Any crew thinking of trusting a Gates-expedited vaccine should see this first - - walter May 14, 2020, 12:18 pm   Searching