- though without the ad homs perhaps. I'm also suffering from ad homs for my thought crimes here at home, and in what I write elsewhere, marginalised as a conspiracy theorist, a Trumpist, an anti-masker, and so on. I am, and remain, commmitted to scientific analysis of this subject, which may lead to speculation about covert plans and agendas, but as with the Salisbury poisoning are the inevitable consequence of scientific observations.
Tell me what it means that Novichok could not have been spread in the Salisbury environment without killing anyone, and how the conclusions affect the "bona fides" of dictates from the same government that brought us "highly likely" and thousands more dead in Syria.... How is this different?