Re: Read some Darren Allen. Your tiny mind would be expanded (even if you disagree with him). Archived Message
Posted by rippon on August 10, 2020, 5:54 pm, in reply to "Re: Read some Darren Allen. Your tiny mind would be expanded (even if you disagree with him)."
"Oh its just your opinion. Right then. Nothing to worry about." Neither of us are scientists working in the field, so everything we each say is just opinion. Moreover, even with scientists working in the field, it is still very much just opinion, because there are equally eminent people with diametrically opposed views, with, it seems, neither side being able to trounce the other with slam-dunk arguments. And your opinions are certainly nothing to worry about, not least because they are spewed from a demented mind and frothing mouth - you're not managing to calm down. "Sweden case in point. Can’t converse with factual information" The fact is that Sweden is not standing out as a covid disaster. But you're the one highlighting the importance of data; so perhaps you can link me to some data that shows Sweden is a covid disaster compared to the rest of the world. "So what preventative actions do you take on this?" Again, you cannot grasp what I say. My argument is that the whole approach is wrong. It is nonsense to focus on what individuals are doing and trying to police their actions (e.g. mask-wearing, getting vaccinated). Public health, e.g. people's immunity, depends overwhelmingly on what corporations do - the quality of our food, air and water. The biggest strides in public health came from improved housing, sanitation and nutrition, not from vaccines - which you casually put your blind faith in, unconcerned about big-pharma, unconcerned about the damage to the health of millions that you casually promote. But your throbbing temples and frothing mouth renders you blind to actual answers to your questions and that's why you can defecate further nonsense such as "void of any policy discussion". There are plenty of people on this site who disagree with me, but they're not completely stupid; so they would be able to tell you that Rippon's output is not void of any policy discussion (he just happens to be wrong in rejecting the standard covid narrative). "Was I too rough with you" Not at all. Please keep your defecations coming. They're not a pretty sight, but I do find mental derangement interesting, so you continue to hold my attention.
|
|