prove to be as they're officially described. But assume ALL official explanations are guilty until proven innocent. Meantime, keep an open-minded scepticism in play, tricky though that may prove to be. I'm quite willing, for example, to accept that men really have walked on the Moon. It may prove so, yet. But - open-mindedly sceptical - I have to conclude that the evidence that they did is looking ever less convincing, as the evidence that they didn't continues to trickle out, under the influence of the unprecedented free flowing of information that began after that time. (I'm hypothesising that - if it was a scam - they didn't anticipate in the '60s that it would come under such fierce, worldwide scrutiny with the starting of the extreme-information age).
And yes of course: everyone has blind spots, and no-one can see their own (wouldn't be blind spots if they could, would they?) and relies on others to point them out.