Re: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership Archived Message
Posted by margo on November 3, 2019, 2:25 pm, in reply to "Re: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership "
The other article I posted today (about the Magnitsky hoax) adds a curious angle to this case. It reveals an intersection of lawyers for Assange and lawyers for the 'Mi6" conman Bill Browder (of the Magnitsky hoax - linked with Russiagate, Jonathan Steele, etc). Should this raise red flags? Does Assange have appropriate counsel: can he trust the people who surround him? His lawyers said in court a few weeks ago that they've only managed to get his first legal documents to him now. After six months?? It's illegal under international law to deny a prisoner the tools/documents to prepare for a case. Why aren't his lawyers shouting louder, when the law's actually on their side? The only person who's sticking his neck out (a decent human being who's been fighting for Assange since the day he met him in Belmarsh 6 months ago) is Professor Nils Melzer, professor of international law at University of Glasgow. [UK state wishes Melzer would disappear - because he's after them on Assange and also after them on a different case about UK's role in torture cases]. This explains why Assange stood in court, looking confused, saying he "doesn't understand what's going on' and 'hopes his lawyers explain later'? Of course he didn't understand: he's held in solitary, his mail has been illegally withheld for 3 months and his lawyers had only given him papers two weeks earlier. Given how everything goes against him in this case... has Assange has been thrown under the bus, by all? Supporters talk about 'media rights' but what's forgotten is the 'human rights' of a man - son, brother and father - subject to some fairly astonishing procedural abuses, here. J'AccuseNews (@NewsAccuse) writes: "Assange needs new lawyers. Currently, he's represented by Matrix Chambers, which receives dollars from the US govt in the Credit Suisse case and by Doughty Street Chambers, the head of which shills for the Maginstky hoax which is a UK-US-intell-allied propaganda campaign". UN Rapporteur Nils Melzer very deliberately re-tweeted a warning about Assange a couple of days ago: re-stating his worries about risks to Assange's life. I think it's a note that should be shared far and wide: it puts the UK govt on public notice that it will have blood on its hands should anything befall Assange. As more Australians work out what's really going on - and that their citizen is a man to be proud of - Australian anger towards the UK will sour a Commonwealth partnership. That's the risk and the cost for the UK as it holds the illegally renditioned asylee-in-transit Assange, ready for shipment to Virginia, in defiance of the law of non-refoulement and in spite of CIA/Spanish spying that fatally breached his doctor-client and lawyer-client privileges (these privileges are supposedly a cornerstone of UK law). LINK https://ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25249&LangID=E Previous Message UN expert on torture sounds alarm again that Julian Assange’s life may be at risk GENEVA (1 November 2019) - The UN Special Rapporteur on torture, Nils Melzer, has expressed alarm at the continued deterioration of Julian Assange’s health since his arrest and detention earlier this year, saying his life was now at risk. Mr. Assange was sent to a UK high-security prison on 11 April 2019 where he continues to be held in connection with a US extradition request on espionage charges for having exposed evidence for US war crimes and other misconduct in Iraq and Afghanistan. “While the US Government prosecutes Mr. Assange for publishing information about serious human rights violations, including torture and murder, the officials responsible for these crimes continue to enjoy impunity,” said Melzer. The Special Rapporteur and his medical team visited the imprisoned Wikileaks founder in May and reported that he showed “all the symptoms typical for prolonged exposure to psychological torture” and demanded immediate measures for the protection of his health and dignity. “However, what we have seen from the UK Government is outright contempt for Mr. Assange’s rights and integrity,” Melzer said. “Despite the medical urgency of my appeal, and the seriousness of the alleged violations, the UK has not undertaken any measures of investigation, prevention and redress required under international law.” Under the Convention against Torture, States must conduct a prompt and impartial investigation wherever there is reasonable ground to believe that an act of torture has been committed. “In a cursory response sent nearly five months after my visit, the UK Government flatly rejected my findings, without indicating any willingness to consider my recommendations, let alone to implement them, or even provide the additional information requested,” the UN expert said. As predicted by Melzer, shortly after the Special Rapporteur’s visit, Mr. Assange had to be transferred to the prison’s health care unit. «He continues to be detained under oppressive conditions of isolation and surveillance, not justified by his detention status,” said Melzer, adding that having completed his prison sentence for violating UK bail terms in 2012, Mr. Assange was now being held exclusively in relation to the pending extradition request from the United States. “Despite the complexity of the proceedings against him led by the world’s most powerful Government, Mr. Assange’s access to legal counsel and documents has been severely obstructed, thus effectively undermining his most fundamental right to prepare his defence,” said Melzer. “The blatant and sustained arbitrariness shown by both the judiciary and the Government in this case suggests an alarming departure from the UK’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law. This is setting a worrying example, which is further reinforced by the Government’s recent refusal to conduct the long-awaited judicial inquiry into British involvement in the CIA torture and rendition programme. “In my view, this case has never been about Mr. Assange’s guilt or innocence, but about making him pay the price for exposing serious governmental misconduct, including alleged war crimes and corruption. Unless the UK urgently changes course and alleviates his inhumane situation, Mr. Assange’s continued exposure to arbitrariness and abuse may soon end up costing his life.” In his urgent appeal to the UK Government, the Special Rapporteur strongly recommended that Mr. Assange’s extradition to the United States be barred, and that he be promptly released and allowed to recover his health and rebuild his personal and professional life. ENDS
|
|