Signed both those. Ta, M. (one of them had a target of a mere 200 signatures - !?) NOM Archived Message Posted by Rhisiart Gwilym on November 3, 2019, 4:48 pm, in reply to "Re: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership " Message Thread: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership - margo November 3, 2019, 7:52 am I know what he means about that frustrated feeling. WhereTF do we turn to offer help!!! NOM - Rhisiart Gwilym November 3, 2019, 11:12 am Re: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership - brooks November 3, 2019, 12:19 pm Smells rather like astroturfing going on with the JA 'defence' outfits. Logical extension of the - Rhisiart Gwilym November 3, 2019, 2:04 pm Re: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership - margo November 3, 2019, 2:25 pm Re: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership - Shyaku November 4, 2019, 12:07 am A word on barristers - margo November 4, 2019, 8:22 am Re: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership - margo November 3, 2019, 2:44 pm Re: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership - brooks November 3, 2019, 3:20 pm Re: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership - margo November 3, 2019, 4:29 pm Signed both those. Ta, M. (one of them had a target of a mere 200 signatures - !?) NOM - Rhisiart Gwilym November 3, 2019, 4:48 pm Re: Liberating Assange: a woeful lack of leadership - brooks November 3, 2019, 6:19 pm Wikileaks twitter feed seems very active on assange. Nm - Shyaku November 3, 2019, 11:48 pm   Searching