- Balls.. Archived Message
Posted by Gerard
on December 27, 2019, 11:20 am, in reply to "As usual, this is humanities masquerading as science, because science has explanatory power, whereas"
|
"The humanities have foundation funding that comes indirectly from the CIA and associated luminaries, and therefore the humanities and social sciences are currently politically ascendent. They very badly need a "theory of everything"." With the sectarian blinkers firmly on there S! "Ahem!" Who provides massive funding for the LHC and other projects? Lockheed Martin old mate! Who subsidises the nuclear industry?...National govts. esp. those who use reactors to make weapons grade uranium/plutonium etc. Social Science is science..if you are going to refute something do try avoid playing to the gallery of self-satisfied (although I know not why), state funded "standard" (conventional), scientists..cant is very unattractive matey! "quote; “..the intersectionalities which truly exist are subverted by algorithmic profiling that by identifying (according to the "pursuit of happiness" individual profit motive), "new" groups or "segments" then attempts to create or "encourage" (depending on the degree of development of the perceived or potential grouping), both them and the artificial intersectionalities they themselves create. We might see these new segments and intersections as "counter-revolutionary" (in a literal way in that they interrupt the cyclical movements of true commerce -a form of sabotage-, for true commerce recognises that the efficiency of a thing is also in its lifespan and repair-ability -that is if the manufacture of the repair is itself efficient, "planned obsolescence" is antithetical to the pursuit of sustainability and the protection/encouragement of biodiversity-, the "pursuit of happiness" model of economic growth does not, instead it attempts to optimize short-term profit for the minimum number of individuals), or even "5th Column" for they are designed to eradicate or prevent the evolution of consciousness within pre-existing "classes" or "segments" (or potential what one might term, "natural" groupings), and replace that consciousness with another "ready-made" alternative, such consciousness is also vital to the recognition of "sameness" between the segments (the "intersectionalities"), and therefore this too is deliberately disrupted and manipulated (interesting that this should highlight how Marxist analysis of economically determined relationships should still have relevance once removed from the anachronistic context of the Industrial Revolution)." Go to: http://www.arafel.co.uk/2017/03/squaring-circles-intersectionalities.html" https://www.arafel.co.uk/2018/03/the-whole-story-epidemiology.html |