- Re: Thanks Walter, for doing the leg work, and showing Archived Message
Posted by walter
on May 9, 2020, 2:01 pm, in reply to "Re: Thanks Walter, for doing the leg work, and showing "
|
This isn't really any better in terms of being evidence. MoA: "The author is Judy Mikovits, a disgraced 'scientist' who has been caught faking her research and papers." He asserts as a fact that she is disgraced, but questions if she was a scientist, and asserts she is guilty of fakery from the beginning, but using main tropes around which he doesn't go into. How would this be evidence SB - if MoA is so predisposed to accept the view of the establishment she is criticizing? Your second link there is no more objective, it seems: "In the video, Mikovits regurgitates a number of questionable claims surrounding treatment of the virus, including support for hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malarial drug that was promoted by President Donald Trump as a possible remedy despite a lack of scientific evidence — and in some cases fatal side effects — associated with it." Doesn't he/she know that HCQ is the treatment of choice in some countries? Yet it's more important that Trump - a figure of fun and ridicule - promoted it and caused a death. Is this not a spectacular example of guilt by association? Are you getting my point yet, SB? I'd like to know - you're almost my last hope  Cheers |