- Re: Thanks Walter, for doing the leg work, and showing Archived Message
Posted by walter
on May 11, 2020, 3:27 am, in reply to "Re: Thanks Walter, for doing the leg work, and showing "
|
About that confusion - you posted in the wrong place. Your post was so aggressive that it wasn't clear what you were referring to. And when I expressed confusion as to what you were talking about you doubled down making accusations, rather than even look back to the previous post to clear up the confusion. "You said she wasnt referring to covid 19 when she made her flu vaccine claim" Are you winging it or something? Read the posts. I explained the two things she said; 1), with reference to the study (that found 36% increase, was about coronaviruses generally - as was Gande's discussion of that point) and 2) later when she did make the claim about Covid-19. Here is the post: "She does later include Covid-19, thereby including Covid-19 in interpreting the result. It is after all a coronavirus. In addition she has her extra angle on Covid 19 specifically." https://members5.boardhost.com/xxxxx/msg/1589112318.html After you said this in reply "Not to mention again not talking about SARS- COV 2" I repeated the explanation: " Once more, her citing of this study referred only to coronaviruses. That was what Gande criticized so theatrically. He was talking about coronaviruses too. Later on she included Covid-19, a coronavirus, along with her angle on that. " Nothing was wrong with what I said. You have been wasting my time repeating posts that you can't be bothered to look at before replying. And it's not good to make personal sleights when you don't understand a reply, or the other person is confused by your reply. If we can't have better discussions than this I won't be having any. |