The Lifeboat News
[ Message Archive | The Lifeboat News ]

    And one for luck... Archived Message

    Posted by Ian M on August 2, 2022, 8:22 pm, in reply to "#29"

    Have to include this astonishing barefaced denial about the rise of far-right fascism in Ukraine:

    #30: What untruths is Russia spreading about Nazis in Ukraine?, March 27th





    Newsreader Ros Atkins: 'Vladimir Putin has given several reasons for his invasion of Ukraine. This is one of them.'

    Vladimir Putin: 'We will be aiming at demilitarization and de-nazification of Ukraine.'

    Ros Atkins: 'At a recent Putin rally a banner declared for a world without nazism and Putin has described a gang of drug addicts and neo-nazis who settled in Kiev and took the entire Ukrainian people hostage. But Russia's claims about nazis in Ukraine are a mix of falsehoods and distortions. For a start Ukrainians are not being held hostage by nazis. Their president Vladimir Zelensky, he's Jewish, he has relatives who died in the holocaust and he's president because he won 73 per cent of the vote in 2019. The main far-right candidate reached 1.6 percent and that result is part of a broader shift. In the 2012 parliamentary election the main far-right party won 10 per cent. In 2014 it was 6 percent. In 2019 it was 2 per cent. No far-right groups have any formal political power in Ukraine and based on polling and results the far right's much less popular in Ukraine than, for example, the leader of the far-right in France, Marine le Pen. Far-right groups though do exist in Ukraine and Russia's focus on them is not new.'

    Izabella Tabarovsky, Wilson Center: 'The word de-nazify, the idea that Ukraine has been overrun by the nazis is something that Russian propaganda has been talking about for eight years since the first invasion of ukraine in 2014.'

    Ros Atkins: 'Ukraine wasn't, and isn't being overrun by nazis, but what happened eight years ago is relevant here. That's because in late 2013, under pressure from Putin, Ukraine's then president Viktor Yanukovych backed out of a cooperation deal with the EU. Huge protests followed, as would a crackdown. In time Yanukovych would flee to Russia. This was a challenge to Putin's ability to influence Ukraine, and he retaliated. First, Russia annexed Crimea, then it backed separatists in parts of eastern Ukraine. And this is where the story connects back to the far right, because in 2014 the Ukrainian military was much smaller than it is now. It was struggling, and brigades of volunteers joined the fight against the separatists. Some of them had far-right elements, the most high profile was this one: the Azov battalion. It was set up by this man, Andriy Biletsky, who has a history of racist and anti-semitic views. And in 2014 the BBC's Steve Rosenberg spoke to him.'

    Steve Rosenberg: [caption translation] 'Much has been written about Azov. About it being ultranationalist and even neo-nazi. What is Azov's ideology?'

    Andriy Biletsky: 'Yes, we're nationalists. We've never hidden that. Our whole ideology is in our symbol. It's a combination of the letters I and N. It means 'Idea of the Nation'.'

    Ros Atkins: 'This [pictured] is the Azov emblem being shown to Steve there. It's a pagan symbol known as wolf's angel, and a version of it was used by some SS units in nazi Germany. Andreas Umland's [of the Swedish Institute for International Affairs] an expert on Ukrainian nationalism. He's looked at this, writing: "The wolf's angel has far-right connotations but it's not considered a fascist symbol by the population in Ukraine." That may be but back in 2015 Azov acknowledged that some of its fighters held nazi views. A spokesperson told USA Today that only 10 to 20 percent of the group's members are nazis, and he sought to make a distinction using one fighter as an example: "I know Alex is a nazi," he said, "but it's his personal ideology. It has
    nothing to do with the official ideology of the Azov."

    Now the degree of nazi sentiment in Azov is impossible to verify but this 2015 quote is relevant, because by this time Azov had become part of Ukraine's national guard. It was under government command and there was one main reason for that happening.'

    Kacper Rekawek, University of Oslo: 'We have to be honest, they were just good fighters in 2014 and they seem to be pretty good fighters now in Mariupol. That's why they were taken on the books.'

    Ros Atkins: 'And in 2014, with Russia backing separatists, urgent military considerations trumped all others. Ukraine was under attack and its then president Petro Poroshenko called Azov "our best warriors" but when in 2015 he was asked by the BBC about the group's far-right links his reply was blunt: "Please, don't listen [sic] Russian propaganda."

    Russia has used Azov in its propaganda for years, and as we assess claims about Azov's role in Ukraine context is vital here. Ukraine's armed forces total 250,000 plus 50,000 national guard. Azov is part of the national guard with around a thousand volunteer fighters. It's a tiny fraction of the Ukrainian military. It's also not the same force as it was in 2014.'

    Adrien Nonjon, National Institute of Oriental Languages & Civilizations: 'Azov opened its recruitment to the whole of Ukrainian society and eventually this radical core was drowned out by the mass of newcomers who joined the regiment because it was an elite unit.'

    Ros Atkins: 'And while the membership was evolving the founder also left to start a new far-right political party, a party which has failed to achieve any electoral success. But the Azov regiment that he left behind is high profile and mainstream. This is the view of the Ukrainian government:'

    Anton Herashchenko, Adviser to Ukraine's Interior Minister: 'The only nazi elements we have on the territory of Ukraine now are the Russian fascist army.'

    Ros Atkins: 'In the last few days president Zelensky announced that Azov's commander in Mariupol will receive the highest national military award. But despite this acclaim, despite the evolving membership, questions about neo-nazi links remain. In January Buzzfeed's Christopher Miller reported that he'd seen an Azov veteran wearing white supremacist and nazi symbols. There is, though, no evidence such sentiment is widespread. Here's Vitaliy Shevchenko from BBC monitoring:'

    Vitaliy Shevchenko: 'I was looking at the Azov battalion's social media activity and its website and all they talk about is fighting the Russian forces, and there's very little in terms of extremist anti-migrant or xenophobic rhetoric there.'

    Ros Atkins: 'And so it is this Azov regiment that is part of Ukraine's resistance, and just as in 2014 its focus is the Donbas region that includes the two breakaway republics and the city of Mariupol. It is close to the sea of Azov which gives the regiment its name. It's also where Azov made its name back in 2014. Azov successfully defended the city. As Mariupol is bombarded by the Russians now, alongside other Ukrainian forces it's trying to do so again. And Azov's presence in Mariupol once more makes it central to Russia's false narratives. You'll remember the horror of Russia bombing a maternity hospital in the city. Afterwards the Russians said this:'

    Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister: 'At the UN security council facts were proffered by our delegation saying that the maternity hospital had been taken over by Azov battalion and other radicals.'

    Ros Atkins: 'But there's no evidence Azov were based there, no evidence it was a military facility. Then there's Russia's attack on a theater in Mariupol that was sheltering civilians. Russia accuses Azov of doing this. There's absolutely no evidence this is true. And so while any Azov volunteers having nazi sympathies is shocking and worthy of note, neo-nazis are not the threat that Russia describes.

    But perhaps this is not about an actual threat and rather about something else entirely. The New York Times writes of how the word nazi "appears geared towards Russians, for whom remembrance of the Soviet Union's victory over nazi Germany remains perhaps the single most powerful element of a unifying national identity." Putin is looking to the past to create motivation in the present. This is the historian Shane O'Rourke:'

    Shane O'Rourke, York University: 'What the regime is doing is using the memory of the war, the very deep feelings it arouses, to legitimize its actions not just in Ukraine but in many other places as well.'

    Ros Atkins: 'Putin has his reasons to do this but he doesn't have the facts. Just after Russia's invasion 150 historians who studied genocide, nazism and World War 2 released a statement. In it they argue "this rhetoric is factually wrong, morally repugnant and deeply offensive to the memory of millions of victims of nazism and those who courageously fought against it." The rhetoric is factually wrong. Nazis don't hold Ukraine hostage. They're not launching attacks on Ukrainians. There's no evidence to support this kind of claim:'

    Sergei Markov, Former Russian MP: 'Most of the Ukrainians hate these neo nazi groups and they pray for Russia and for somebody else to liberate ukrainian society from a nazi group.'

    Ros Atkins: 'Ukrainians don't need liberating from nazis. To their president this idea is pure fiction:'

    Vladimir Zelensky: 'It's already the 25th day of the Russian military trying in vain to find imaginary nazis from whom they allegedly want to defend our people, just as they're trying in vain to find Ukrainians who would greet them with flowers.'

    Ros Atkins: 'That search will continue to be in vain because, while the evolution of the Azov regiment deserves scrutiny, neo-nazis and the far-right do not play the role in Ukraine that Russia falsely describes. They didn't in 2014 they don't now.'

    *****

    A complete whitewash, ignoring and distorting so much evidence about the Azov battalion and the prominence of far-right, fascist politics and organisation in Ukraine. The only purpose of this lengthy piece is to shore up Ukrainian propaganda and attack Russia's - hardly the act of a disinterested, impartial broadcaster. When has the BBC ever devoted so much time and effort in an attempt to debunk western 'untruths' in the run-up to its numerous wars?

    Message Thread: | This response ↓