Re: Yep. Most climate scientists also see debating sceptics as a waste of time. Archived Message
Posted by Raskolnikov on June 21, 2023, 10:17 am, in reply to "Re: Yep. Most climate scientists also see debating sceptics as a waste of time."
Yes, it's almost like they took different clips from different times when the scientists had more data and more time to evaluate that data and then said things based on that new information. Stunning. To be honest, I don't trust that guy but hunches are not evidence. "You've said nothing of substance"?????? After posting three videos that are 99% ad-hominem garbage. Seriously? Never once in the last two threads on this topic have you posted any evidence of the claims being made, nor responded to the counter evidence that was posted. Funnily enough this is demonstrating the exact behaviour I noted in my first post on the other thread; keep shouting "They won't debate him" as if this proves their claims, never engaging with the actual evidence and examining the claims versus the evidence. Also, a debate is the last thing that happens on those shows and, more importantly, "Debate" isn't part of the process that proves claims about medicine to be right or wrong. Dore or Rogan could have presented all that themselves; they could have collected the counter evidence and then asked RFK why it's wrong. It still would have been a biased shit show but they didn't do it. Instead they just keep shouting debate, debate, debate. I'm open to believing that "big pharma" would do things to put people at risk if they made more money; it's been documented and proved in the past but the point is "documented and proved". Pot heads rattling off ad-hom shit into the camera to keep their channel's clicks up doesn't count. A bit like Michael Corleone, I keep getting dragged back into these threads because the clear stupidity of the grifter arguments annoys me but why not take your own advice and post something of substance on the topic?
|
|