John, the landings and 11/9 are two different orders of probability -Archived Message
Posted by Rhisiart Gwilym on July 31, 2019, 7:46 am, in reply to "Re: Moon Landings"
The landings may have been a hoax - despite Kettering Grammar. That's a debatable question (which on a site like this is highly to the point). OTOH, the 11/9 false flag is conclusively exposed, for anyone who wants to take the plunge, insist to him/herself that they simply must keep an open mind, and then gets properly familiar - key proviso, not many have - with all the evidence that's now been accumulated.
People who've actually done that - rather than just dithering about with comfortable 'opinions' about it, based more on emotional need than on hard trust in the evidence of lying eyes and lying common-sense (and basic physics) - come to the, often very painful, conclusion that, yes, clearly it was a false flag, with all the horrible implications that that carries.
The 11/9 false flag is an established fact for all who care about the primacy of sober evidence. Lumping it in with something self-evidently ridiculous such as flatearthery is a classic agenda-serving dishonest-debunker trick. Why not just bray 'cospithirry!' and have done. It all amounts to saying: There are some things which simply may not be questioned - ever.
The same confidence level that we can have about 11/9 isn't - yet - available about the moon landings. But the doubt is most certainly justified. Lots of stuff there which just doesn't add up.
Surely, this web-site is about precisely these matters, isn't it: the way narrative control has become central to political control of entire populations, and how that all works in detail. And add in too the frightening matter of the way false-flag hoaxes have become so prominent lately. Aren't these the sort of things that TLN is about? Yet here we witness several posters throwing various strengths of temper-tantrum because emotionally-precious beliefs are subject to the rational questioning which is very much in TLN's remit. Beliefs, let's never forget, got almost entirely from authority figures in the media, particularly on TV. "I KNOW it's true! I just watched it on the telly!" (Er - quite!)
Questioning these unexamined injections of belief from the narrative-control machine ruffles the feathers of we Strasburg geese, clearly, even amongst the naturally dissident ones; but that questioning is necessary, essential indeed, all the same.