Ras, the Deceivia dismissal is dead-centre relevant here. I'm saying that its very much part of the Archived Message
Posted by Rhisiart Gwilym on July 31, 2019, 9:25 am, in reply to "Re: John, the landings and 11/9 are two different orders of probability -"
West's narrative-control requirements, and therefore can't be trusted even minimally on any matter which touches on the Western gics' list of absolutely-vital narratives. And sureashell the official, orthodox moon-landings narrative is part of that miasma. But in any case, Deceivia is known to fake and distort freely; so why give it even minimal trust on anything - even if it is felt to be an emotionally-precious 'resource'; as it is for many. For my part, I couldn't care less if it just vanishes. There are other, more trustworthy sources of information. Wikideceivia delenda est!
|
|