Re: Thunberg spat round 2 : Medialens and OffGuardian. Archived Message
Posted by brooks on September 27, 2019, 8:28 am, in reply to "Re: Thunberg spat round 2 : Medialens and OffGuardian."
Alan is simply pointing out the logical conclusion of the line of thinking/strategy you endorse. No offence, but if you aren't capable of making the facile conceptual distinction between questioning an editor's decision to publish something and calling for the material to be burned or banned, then you probably aren't the most reliable authority on logical conclusions. Perhaps you think Dan is calling for all zionist articles to be burned because he refuses to host them on his site? As to the rest of your strange post, I have no idea what connection, logical or otherwise, it's supposed to have to my comments.
|
|