Alan accused Brooks of wanting George Galloway (someone brooks is a fan of) to be a creep.
Someone else 'totally agreed' with this post, and thanked him for it! This accusation was challenged by Brooks; hardly surprising.
Alan then 'asks' something else instead. Brooks asks again for the justification for the adhom. Alan says it's not all about Brooks (!) and wants his new question answered.
Alan's accusations evidently do not matter to Alan. So Alan has not been 'totally reasonable'. No-one should agree with a fabricated position attributed to another poster - and certainly not someone who bangs on all the time about Truth