There is indeed absolutely no room for naivety; especially in hacks. And the call that Vanessa and Archived Message
Posted by RhG  on December 17, 2019, 11:50 am, in reply to "Re: Only consistent since the conversion, apparently, b. T'other b gives some chapter and verse. Worth"
colleagues made was - simply to tell the truth, regardless...
I wonder seriously about Max being naive enough - then - and yet being so savvy about the inner villainies of empire - now - to not have seen what was really going on in the aggression against Syria, from the start. Plenty of us did see it. And if he saw it, but condoned by silence or even active support, what does that say about a commitment to truth-telling? And justice?
"Once found out to be a liar..." or even just a truth-ignorer...
|
| Message Thread:
- bMoA doesn't believe Blumenthal/Norton/Khalek are straight. (and yes, I HAVE read the piece before - RhG December 17, 2019, 7:57 am
- Re: bMoA doesn't believe Blumenthal/Norton/Khalek are straight. (and yes, I HAVE read the piece before - brooks December 17, 2019, 8:19 am
- Only consistent since the conversion, apparently, b. T'other b gives some chapter and verse. Worth - RhG December 17, 2019, 9:23 am
- Re: Only consistent since the conversion, apparently, b. T'other b gives some chapter and verse. Worth - margo December 17, 2019, 11:21 am
- There is indeed absolutely no room for naivety; especially in hacks. And the call that Vanessa and - RhG December 17, 2019, 11:50 am
- Re: Only consistent since the conversion, apparently, b. T'other b gives some chapter and verse. Worth - brooks December 17, 2019, 12:18 pm
- Re: Only consistent since the conversion, apparently, b. T'other b gives some chapter and verse. Worth - Tomski December 17, 2019, 12:42 pm
- It's not rocket science - Poster123 December 17, 2019, 1:11 pm
|
|