- Been having a laff at one of those dorks who KNOWS BEYOND DOUBT that a certain thing actually happen Archived Message
Posted by Rhisiart Gwilym
on July 27, 2019, 1:10 pm
-ed in the way that the currently-orthodox official meme says it did; a dork who erupts into a fountain of loquacious chop-logic, strongly spiced with a purported scientific fluency of knowldege, and with scoffing insults against those who disagree (always a giveaway that he has no actually-conclusive evidence, and he knows it, deep down). A twat who calls him/herself 'Fight nonsense', in this case inevitably shortened to 'nonsense', of course (you'd think s/he'd anticipate that!). This is in the comment tail of the OffG article on the ever-widening tally of people around the world who don't believe the official US moon-landings story. Yeah, that!  I've found myself in an odd situation here. Unlike the 11/9 event, which I'd stake my grand-children's lives is definitely a false-flag, I had formed no hard opinion on the authenticity - or not - of the moon-landings. But in the course of this dust up, I've encountered a lot of material that is interestingly suggestive; quite a lot of it from writers whose credentials I have found in the past to be impressive. I wanted to post a link to one of these; a commentator of whom I hadn't heard before, but who seems pretty persuasive. However, my main motives for posting a link to him here are two: first, he's piss funny; there are pictures that he offers which have me guffawing and spluttering: "Of course he's right!! These pictures are such bollocks. In fact they're downright hilarious! Why didn't I see it before? It is, after all, pretty obvious when you look with an open-minded-but-sceptical eye." My second motive is that I'm edging closer to the idea that we are, right now, living through an era of multiple, deliberate, professionally-calculated and designed Big Lies like nothing human history has ever seen before. The gics have discovered that they can do it effectively enough, and get away with it, so they do. This - of course - is prime matter to something like TLN: the way we're so comprehensively manipulated by lying narrative-management, on an industrial scale, all the goddamned time! As the linked writer points out, once you've internalised that realisation solidly, you realise that trusting our pundits and 'leaders' on anything at all is a deeply problematic thing, much though we yearn naturally to do it. We need to cultivate instead a quite different stance, really of permanent - and profound - mistrust. This is actually quite essential to stay both sane and self-sovereign. Far from being a sceptical crew here, we may well not yet be sceptical enough to deal with our present parlous reality. And yet this vessel is already a nest of dissident malcontent sceptics! But maybe not yet sceptical enough, perhaps? The real piss-funny pics are in Part 2 of this multi-parter. Here's the link to Part1: http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/ |