Re: For every eminent pathologist producing illicit videos there are thousands of medcis Archived Message
Posted by Dan on November 23, 2020, 7:35 am, in reply to "Re: For every eminent pathologist producing illicit videos there are thousands of medcis"
Sorry for not making myself clear but I think you should be able to recall my multiple previous responses to you. Test, trace, isolate is the solution - a lockdown is unnecessary with an appropriate public health response. In it's absence it is necessary to slow the rate of spread so that the health system remains functional. It should only be used as an interim measure until the proper response has been implemented. Of course I'm concerned about the critical surgeries / procedures / investigations that are being delayed - It's not possible to look after cancer patients, people having heart attacks and strokes or perform any elective surgery if ICUs are past full. It is obvious that there other harms which is why I am advocating a solution which minimises harm rather than picks one group over another. As predicted you are asking for the answer to a calculation - you have no idea of the answer either. You are obviously not a believer in MMT - massive inflation following public spending is just a lie economists tell to us to justify no public spending. No surprise. The dangers of printing money is the biggest hoax - it's ok to print hundreds of billions of pounds in UK and give it to banks but heaven forbid we give it to people to prevent them from going into debt or losing their houses. Giving people printed money to keep them afloat is not inflationary but is a dangerous idea. Ditto your World Bank behaviour - the obvious solution is to pay people during a pandemic - Spain has implemented Universal Basic Income. You can be absolutely sure they don't want that idea catching on anywhere. I've no doubt that the gangsters in charge want to screw us over. The world bank wanting to tie countries to loans and reset us is no different from them wanting to insist on carbon trading as a solution to global warming. Their prime imperatives are to protect capital and transfer wealth upwards. Again, nothing to do with an appropriate response. Sunetra Gupta is lying - the whole Great Barrington declaration rests on an unbelievable assertion that we just need to protect vulnerable people for 3 months. It's extremely unlikely the disease is going to disappear in 3 months after everyone has had it. I can't prove it ine way or another but neither can she. The other corona viruses are endemic and rotate through the population. Resistance is temporary and partial. Already we have been able to show that antibodies to COVID 19 diminish in the same way as for the first SARS virus. So to claim that you know that the virus will be gone with certainty based on mathematical modelling is a bluff. I know it's a bluff. She knows it's a bluff - it's a completely unsupportable claim. From the way her delivery changes in the video I'm pretty certain that she knows that we know. Neil Ferguson is irrelevant to that point.
|
|