- Re: But then you're not taking account of the deaths Archived Message
Posted by Willem
on April 28, 2020, 2:19 am, in reply to "Re: But then you're not taking account of the deaths "
|
Well, my one-liner was just a short reply to your subject line. It cannot contain everything I'm thinking. It still seems premature to me to come to any solid conclusion -- by your reasoning all countries which are worse in your table have presumably also already failed? And do you draw the line after Sweden? I get you don't like the lockdown; Whether I like it is irrelevant. My main point has always been that the repercussions are not being assessed. Just like you've just done again -- no acknowledgement of what eg the UN says. if you aren't proposing to 'do nothing' I think you need better suggestions that are more concrete.- or people will continue to not get what you mean. I'm not sure why I should propose or suggest what to do. For a start I did at various points mention what can be done in previous threads. Then there's a whole load of stuff the WHO suggest short of a lockdown (check that study if you're interested). Now I don't like the fleece job that's being done on the public purse. I'd rather discuss that, than endlessly discuss the minutiae of deaths Not sure what you mean by fleece job, but I haven't been going on about the minutiae of deaths. |