For god's sake don't get into 'dark matter/energy' mack! A substanceless willo'thewisp if ever Archived Message
Posted by Rhisiart Gwilym  on October 5, 2019, 9:21 pm, in reply to "Re: Yeah, but the planet doesn't neeed 'saving', that would be *us*"
there were one. Think phlogiston; think the Ptolemaic solar system; desperate efforts to salvage the unsalvageable, just as the dark thingy is an inherently unworkable imagination game to try to salvage fundamentally-unsalvageable reductive materialism. As you hint, quantum mechanics gave all that the coup-de-grace nearly a century ago; yet it's still writhing.
Oh shit, look out! That bastard thug Billy Occam's here! Watch out for that bloody razor! I reckon it's that damned trouble-maker Tom Campbell who's set him on! 
|
| Message Thread: | This response ↓
- Why Planting Trees Won't Save the Planet - scrabb October 5, 2019, 2:25 pm
- Yeah, but the planet doesn't neeed 'saving', that would be *us* - mack October 5, 2019, 5:09 pm
- Re: Yeah, but the planet doesn't neeed 'saving', that would be *us* - scrabb October 5, 2019, 5:50 pm
- Re: Yeah, but the planet doesn't neeed 'saving', that would be *us* - dereklane October 5, 2019, 6:12 pm
- Re: Yeah, but the planet doesn't neeed 'saving', that would be *us* - mack October 5, 2019, 8:27 pm
- For god's sake don't get into 'dark matter/energy' mack! A substanceless willo'thewisp if ever - Rhisiart Gwilym October 5, 2019, 9:21 pm
- Old, wrong argument. And it says nothing about the sheep. [Sheep? Yes really!] - - Rhisiart Gwilym October 5, 2019, 5:47 pm
- Um, its a steady state even without burying ... - Shyaku October 5, 2019, 7:49 pm
- Apologies to all, but I agree with Dr Gray. Forests are a temporary repository.. - David Macilwain October 6, 2019, 2:07 am
|
|