Re: Um, its a steady state even without burying ... Archived Message
Posted by Gerard on October 6, 2019, 2:17 pm, in reply to "Um, its a steady state even without burying ..."
"Yes, the tree dies, and releases much of its carbon mass into the carbon cycle, but at the same time it recycles its blueprint into the same land area (footprint) via its genetic progeny. When I did biology at elementary school, we went out into the yard to find acorns. Norman Gray take note: This is what they are for. It you increase the mean carbon sequestered per hectare, even if it is in a steady state of life and death, you still sequester more." good point..
|
Message Thread: | This response ↓
- Why Planting Trees Won't Save the Planet - scrabb October 5, 2019, 2:25 pm
- Yeah, but the planet doesn't neeed 'saving', that would be *us* - mack October 5, 2019, 5:09 pm
- Old, wrong argument. And it says nothing about the sheep. [Sheep? Yes really!] - - Rhisiart Gwilym October 5, 2019, 5:47 pm
- Um, its a steady state even without burying ... - Shyaku October 5, 2019, 7:49 pm
- Apologies to all, but I agree with Dr Gray. Forests are a temporary repository.. - David Macilwain October 6, 2019, 2:07 am
|
|