Re: Wooden houses a great start... Archived Message
Posted by David Macilwain on October 7, 2019, 12:12 am, in reply to "Re: Wooden houses a great start..."
Yes you could be right Ken - but didn't want to overstate the amount when I see the thousands of tonnes of timber in forests around me - or for that matter the hundreds of tonnes in trees we planted here 30 years ago. It's just that actually sequestering Carbon, even temporarily, is so difficult compared with simply not digging up coal. There are a hundred reasons to plant trees, including for their fantastic usefulness as timber and firewood, but using them to sequester carbon is relatively a minor consideration as long as we continue to dig up and burn coal oil gas and peat...
|
Message Thread: | This response ↓
- Why Planting Trees Won't Save the Planet - scrabb October 5, 2019, 2:25 pm
- Yeah, but the planet doesn't neeed 'saving', that would be *us* - mack October 5, 2019, 5:09 pm
- Old, wrong argument. And it says nothing about the sheep. [Sheep? Yes really!] - - Rhisiart Gwilym October 5, 2019, 5:47 pm
- Um, its a steady state even without burying ... - Shyaku October 5, 2019, 7:49 pm
- Apologies to all, but I agree with Dr Gray. Forests are a temporary repository.. - David Macilwain October 6, 2019, 2:07 am
|
|